苹果 iPad Pro 12.9 (2017) 平板电脑简短评测大型播放设备。 苹果 iPad Pro 12.9已经不仅更新了一个更快的系统芯片，还改进了相机和显示屏。没有多少可以批评的缺点，但它并不足以完全替代笔记本电脑。Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 07/09/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇹🇷 🇷🇺 🇪🇸 🇮🇹 🇭🇺 🇳🇱 🇵🇹 🇫🇷 Apple iPad Pro Touchscreen Tablet
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 (iPad Pro Series)ProcessorApple A10X Fusion 6 x 2.4 GHz, Cyclone 4?Graphics adapterApple A10X Fusion GPU / PowerVRMemory4 GB , LPDDR4, 1600 MHzDisplay12.90 inch 4:3, 2732 x 2048 pixel 265 PPI, 电容式触控屏, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yesStorageToshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND , 64 GB , 51.24 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Touch ID, 3-way gyroscopic and acceleration sensor, barometer, digital compass, 智能键盘Networking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 6.9 x 305.7 x 220.6Battery41 Wh, 10875 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3.77 V, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 10 hOperating SystemApple iOS 10CameraPrimary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.8, 5x digital zoom, OIS, Auto-HDR, UHD video)Secondary Camera: 7 MPix (f/2.2, Auto-HDR, 1080p video)Additional featuresSpeakers: 4扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, Lightning cable, modular charger, quick-start guide, safety and warranty booklet, 12 Months Warranty, Lightning port, fanlessWeight677 g, Power Supply: 99 g
Price899 EuroLinksApple homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
Size Comparison
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 Apple iPad Pro 12.9 Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 DIN A4 ❌
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
618 MBit/s +20%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
569 MBit/s +11%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
514 MBit/s Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500MPowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
246 MBit/s -52% iperf3 receive AX12Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
615 MBit/s +16%Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
577 MBit/s +9%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
530 MBit/s Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500MPowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
254 MBit/s -52%
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3click to load imagesApple iPad Pro 12.9 (2017)HTC U11Samsung Galaxy S8+Canon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesApple iPad Pro 12.9 (2017)HTC U11Samsung Galaxy S8+Canon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesApple iPad Pro 12.9 (2017)HTC U11Samsung Galaxy S8+Canon EOS 70D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2017) with enabled (left) and disabled (right) TrueTone
603cd/m²622cd/m²597cd/m²606cd/m²650cd/m²618cd/m²624cd/m²622cd/m²586cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 650 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 614.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.98 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 90 %Center on Battery: 650 cd/m²Contrast: 1548:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}Gamma: 2.25CCT: 6734 K
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9"Apple iPad Pro 12.9IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9"Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5"Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.7"Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500MIPS, 2048x1536, 9.7"Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3"Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-70EQIPS, 2160x1440, 12"Screen-43%-34%-39%-174%-77%-221%Brightness middle650399 -39%634 -2%452 -30%489 -25%417 -36%391 -40%Brightness614393 -36%625 2%468 -24%443 -28%401 -35%367 -40%Brightness Distribution9092 2%87 -3%82 -9%86 -4%88 -2%87 -3%Black Level *0.420.22 48%0.39 7%0.43 -2%0.29 31%0.56 -33%Contrast15481814 17%1626 5%1137 -27%1438 -7%698 -55%Colorchecker dE 2000 *12.96 -196%1.9 -90%1.8 -80%5.5 -450%3.63 -263%6.96 -596%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *1.93.9 -105%4 -111%11.6 -511%6.74 -255%13.43 -607%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.53 -100%2.8 -87%1.2 20%6.7 -347%2.18 -45%7.44 -396%Gamma2.25 98%2.21 100%2.26 97%2.11 104%2.06 107%3.09 71%2.41 91%CCT6734 97%7049 92%7027 93%6500 100%7457 87%6767 96%8126 80%Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)71.1582.326353Color Space (Percent of sRGB)97.8799.069983* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White18.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise↘ 12.4 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise↘ 21.2 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 65 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32 ms).
AnTuTu v6 | Geekbench 4.4 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | BaseMark OS II | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
227987 Points Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
217439 Points -5%Apple iPad Pro 12.9
184346 Points -19%HTC U11
175032 Points -23%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
144426 Points -37%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
74177 Points -67%Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
29823 Points -87%Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core ScoreApple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
9358 Points +1%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
9293 Points HTC U11
6443 Points -31%Apple iPad Pro 12.9
5284 Points -43%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4187 Points -55% 64 Bit Single-Core ScoreApple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
3933 Points 0%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
3924 Points Apple iPad Pro 12.9
3097 Points -21%HTC U11
1906 Points -51%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1745 Points -56%3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited ScoreApple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
54449 Points Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
54237 Points 0%HTC U11
40014 Points -27%Apple iPad Pro 12.9
33812 Points -38%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
30277 Points -44%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
9548 Points -82%Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
7786 Points -86%1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics ScoreApple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
110971 Points Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
110148 Points -1%HTC U11
55725 Points -50%Apple iPad Pro 12.9
51124 Points -54%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
34002 Points -69%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
14121 Points -87%Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
7737 Points -93%1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited PhysicsSamsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
21886 Points +12%HTC U11
20140 Points +3%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
19567 Points Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
19534 Points 0%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
16449 Points -16%Apple iPad Pro 12.9
15473 Points -21%Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
7964 Points -59%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0HTC U11
4744 Points +3%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
4588 Points Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
4521 Points -1%Apple iPad Pro 12.9
4061 Points -11%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3438 Points -25%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1092 Points -76%Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
102 Points -98%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 GraphicsApple iPad Pro 12.9
7525 Points +1%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
7434 Points Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
7212 Points -3%HTC U11
5877 Points -21%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4626 Points -38%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
970 Points -87%Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
81 Points -99%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 PhysicsHTC U11
2832 Points +44%Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
1960 Points 0%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
1960 Points Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1955 Points 0%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1811 Points -8%Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1555 Points -21%Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
1040 Points -47%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)Apple iPad Pro 12.9
3806 Points +6%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
3605 Points HTC U11
3590 Points 0%Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
3558 Points -1%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2578 Points -28%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
887 Points -75%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) GraphicsApple iPad Pro 12.9
5384 Points +15%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
4695 Points Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
4537 Points -3%HTC U11
3883 Points -17%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2943 Points -37%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
763 Points -84%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) PhysicsHTC U11
2841 Points +43%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
2054 Points +3%Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
2027 Points +2%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
1988 Points Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1878 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1798 Points -10%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) UnlimitedApple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
5093 Points Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
3975 Points -22%Apple iPad Pro 12.9
3822 Points -25%HTC U11
3268 Points -36%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2702 Points -47%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited GraphicsApple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
6993 Points Apple iPad Pro 12.9
5895 Points -16%Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
5459 Points -22%HTC U11
3324 Points -52%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3196 Points -54%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited PhysicsHTC U11
3085 Points +18%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
2610 Points Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
2036 Points -22%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1754 Points -33%Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1713 Points -34%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex OnscreenApple iPad Pro 12.9
59.3 fps +1%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
59 fps 0%Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
59 fps 0%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
59 fps HTC U11
58 fps -2%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
23 fps -61%Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
13 fps -78%1920x1080 T-Rex OffscreenApple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
225 fps 0%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
224 fps Apple iPad Pro 12.9
163.2 fps -27%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
92 fps -59%HTC U11
91 fps -59%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
29 fps -87%Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
14 fps -94%GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGLApple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
58 fps +26%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
46 fps Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
34 fps -26%Apple iPad Pro 12.9
33.3 fps -28%HTC U11
29 fps -37%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
9.7 fps -79%Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
5.2 fps -89%1920x1080 1080p Manhattan OffscreenApple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
110 fps Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
109 fps -1%Apple iPad Pro 12.9
80.1 fps -27%HTC U11
51 fps -54%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
48 fps -56%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
14 fps -87%Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
5.6 fps -95%GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 OnscreenApple iPad Pro 12.9
54.3 fps +101%Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
43 fps +59%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
27 fps Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
19 fps -30%HTC U11
15 fps -44%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps -100%1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 OffscreenApple iPad Pro 12.9
83 fps +9%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
76 fps Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
63 fps -17%HTC U11
33 fps -57%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
32 fps -58%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps -100%GFXBench
on screen Car Chase OnscreenApple iPad Pro 12.9
13.3 fps Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
13 fps HTC U11
13 fps Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps 1920x1080 Car Chase OffscreenApple iPad Pro 12.9
32.4 fps HTC U11
24 fps Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
19 fps Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
fps BaseMark OS II
OverallApple iPad Pro 12.9
3282 Points HTC U11
3034 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2409 Points Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1652 Points Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
283 Points SystemApple iPad Pro 12.9
6230 Points HTC U11
5570 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3505 Points Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3071 Points Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
1250 Points MemoryHTC U11
2085 Points Apple iPad Pro 12.9
2027 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1931 Points Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1887 Points Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
750 Points GraphicsApple iPad Pro 12.9
8422 Points HTC U11
5976 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4941 Points Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1185 Points Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
729 Points WebHTC U11
1221 Points Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1091 Points Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
1086 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1007 Points Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
9 Points Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
31188 Points Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
30333 Points -3%Apple iPad Pro 12.9
19852 Points -36%HTC U11
11781 Points -62%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
9531 Points -69%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3596 Points -88%Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
2672 Points -91%WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
257 Points +5%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
244 Points Apple iPad Pro 12.9
215 Points -12%HTC U11
162 Points -34%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
132 Points -46%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
98 Points -60%Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
56 Points -77%JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
202.1 Points Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
200.6 Points -1%Apple iPad Pro 12.9
142 Points -30%HTC U11
69.5 Points -66%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
57.4 Points -72%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
42.73 Points -79%Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
18 Points -91%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
14064 ms * -1351%Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M
3001 ms * -210%HTC U11
2760 ms * -185%Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2244 ms * -132%Apple iPad Pro 12.9
1499 ms * -55%Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
973 ms * -0%Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
969 ms * Legend
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 Apple A10X Fusion, Apple A10X Fusion GPU / PowerVR, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 Apple A10X Fusion, Apple A10X Fusion GPU / PowerVR, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND Apple iPad Pro 12.9 Apple A9X, Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe) Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash Huawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash* ... smaller is better
Max. LoadIdle
33.7 °C33 °C34.4 °C 35.6 °C35.6 °C34.8 °C 36.9 °C35.4 °C37.2 °C
Maximum: 37.2 °CAverage: 35.2 °C
31.5 °C32.9 °C33.3 °C33.2 °C34.6 °C35 °C33.2 °C34.3 °C34.6 °C
Maximum: 35 °CAverage: 33.6 °C Power Supply (max.) 57.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
30.7 °C30.9 °C31.6 °C 32.2 °C33 °C32.6 °C 35.7 °C35.1 °C34.7 °C
Maximum: 35.7 °CAverage: 32.9 °C
30.1 °C30.2 °C30.2 °C31.2 °C31.3 °C31.7 °C31.2 °C31.6 °C31.1 °C
Maximum: 31.7 °CAverage: 31 °C Power Supply (max.) 49.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.7% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (8.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 50% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 audio analysis(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)Compared to same class» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 55% worse» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%Compared to all devices tested» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.05 / 0.24 WattIdle 1.55 / 8.58 / 8.59 Watt
Load
10.09 / 10.61 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 201710875 mAhApple iPad Pro 12.910307 mAhSamsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 LTE (SM-P905) mAhApple iPad Pro 10.5 20178134 mAhAsus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M5900 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T8256000 mAhLenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F8500 mAhPower Consumption-33%-23%16%17%29%13%Idle Minimum *1.552.69 -74%3.1 -100%1.44 7%1.59 -3%2.08 -34%2.19 -41%Idle Average *8.5810.95 -28%8.9 -4%6.12 29%4.14 52%3.5 59%4.3 50%Idle Maximum *8.5911.14 -30%9.4 -9%6.14 29%4.23 51%3.58 58%4.37 49%Load Average *10.0911.54 -14%9.8 3%8.55 15%10.89 -8%6.97 31%8.62 15%Load Maximum *10.6112.8 -21%11 -4%10.62 -0%11.58 -9%7.4 30%11.26 -6%* ... smaller is better
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
48h 39min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 16min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 17min
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 201710875 mAhApple iPad Pro 12.910307 mAhApple iPad Pro 10.5 20178134 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T8256000 mAhAsus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M5900 mAhLenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F8500 mAhHuawei MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro6600 mAhBattery Runtime-18%-17%-1%-26%-15%-29%Reader / Idle29191933 -34%2036 -30%1903 -35%1453 -50%1985 -32%1230 -58%H.264676630 -7%629 -7%551 -18%600 -11%702 4%593 -12%WiFi v1.3736695 -6%693 -6%760 3%518 -30%602 -18%416 -43%Load257195 -24%199 -23%375 46%225 -12%222 -14%248 -4%
Pros+ 优秀的屏幕
+ 高品质的做工
+ 不错的扬声器
+ 快速的远程Wi-Fi
+ 快速处理器
+ 电池续航长Cons- 不支持伽利略全球定位系统
- 外壳对压力敏感
- 只有一年的保修期
- 尽管声称，显示却不支持P3
- 存储速度比前代慢
- 充电时间长
- 没有快速充电
In review: Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2017)数据上看，iPad Pro 12.9只不过是一款更大的iPad Pro 10.5，但在现实生活中，它在很多方面都有所不同。精确校准的显示屏幕具有非常准确的色彩精确度，令人印象深刻；扬声器非常均衡；Wi-Fi调制解调器的范围更广；并且电池续航时间更长。
因此，要看个人的偏好和品味。12.9英寸机型，让创意工作、编辑照片和观看电影变得更加有趣。更便携，更好的人体工程学设计和更高的游戏性能则是10.5英寸机型的优势。
iPad Pro 12.9（2017）不仅更大，而且还提供了惊人的120赫兹显示屏，令人印象深刻的性能和更长的电池续航。除此之外，您还可以获得一流的摄像头和非常好的扬声器。
不过，我们不会考虑将iPad Pro 12.9作为笔记本的替代品。iOS仍然太有限，Safari浏览器对复杂的网站和CMS系统的支持很有限。可选的配件；智能键盘，除了在光滑而坚实的表面上可以顺利使用，其他情况下都很难使用。
另一方面，iPad的性能足以应对我们的需求。即使是对未经压缩的照片和超高清视频编辑，也是没有问题的。在我们看来，256 GB存储选项提供了最大的性价比。对于主要消费多媒体内容的用户，较小的64 GB型号也足够了。而尽管价格超高，但512 GB型号肯定会获得大量粉丝。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
- 06/26/2017 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Chassis89%
Keyboard77 / 80 → 96%
Pointing Device96%
Connectivity45 / 65 → 69%
Weight80 / 40-88 → 84%
Battery94%
Display93%
Games Performance72 / 68 → 100%
Application Performance80 / 76 → 100%
Temperature90%
Noise100%
Audio79 / 91 → 87%
Camera81 / 85 → 95%
Average83%
92%
Tablet - Weighted Average
Price comparison
Editor of the original article: Finn D Boerne - Translator - 450 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017
Please share our article, every link counts!